So Osama Bin Laden is dead. Well done USA!
Here is Obama’s speech, including the rather arrogant claim that Bin Laden was not a Muslim. So Obama now determines who is and is not a true follower of the Qu’ran?
I wonder if Bin Laden considered himself a Muslim? I wonder if he would be better qualified to decide than Obama? Let’s see what Wikipedia says:
- Bin Laden was raised as a devout Wahhabi Muslim.
- Bin Laden believed that the restoration of Sharia law will set things right in the Muslim world, and that all other ideologies—”pan-Arabism, socialism, communism, democracy”—must be opposed.
- He believed Afghanistan under the rule of Mullah Omar’s Taliban was “the only Islamic country” in the Muslim world.
Of course, believing these things may not have made him a Muslim. Perhaps he was deluded and believed wrongly and is not now in the presence of 62 virgins.
However, if Bin Laden was not believed to be a Muslim by the 1.2 billion Muslims worldwide, then why was there praise and not worldwide condemnation of him and his actions. If the Pope became an evangelical I doubt Catholics would remain silent.
Here’s a telling nugget from an AP story on the death of Osama (thanks to Bryan Preston):
Officials said the U.S. would ensure that bin Laden’s body was handled in accordance with Islamic tradition.
But why? After all, didn’t Barack Obama say this tonight?
“We must also reaffirm that the United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader. He was a mass murderer of Muslims.”
So why is the body of a mass murderer of Muslims being handled in accordance with Islamic tradition? Aren’t U.S. officials thereby tacitly acknowledging that bin Laden was a Muslim leader, notwithstanding Barack Obama’s protestations to the contrary?
And if Osama was indeed a Muslim leader, what are the implications of that for U.S. policy?
There’s a question no one in official Washington will dare to answer.
Related post: Obama’s Rage