Gotta love this, and of course Dawkins’ honesty about where the materialistic worldview naturally leads.  And if rape is not wrong, but just a personal preference, then why is anything else wrong?

From here.

It gets worse. In a radio interview with Justin Brierley, after his debate with John Lennox in London a few years ago, the following exchange took place between Dawkins and Brierley (starting at 4:57):

Brierley: “But if we had evolved into a society in which rape was considered fine, would that mean that rape is fine?”

Dawkins responded, “I don’t want to answer that question…it’s enough for me to say that we live in a society where it’s not considered fine. We live in a society where selfishness, where failure to pay your debts, failure to reciprocate favors is regarded askance. Ah, that is the society in which we live. I’m very glad…that’s a value judgment, I’m very glad that I live in such a society.”

Brierley: “It is …. But when you make a value judgment don’t you immediately step yourself outside of this evolutionary process and say … the reason this is good is because it’s good, and you don’t have any way to stand on that statement.”

Dawkins: “But my value judgment itself could come from my evolutionary past.”

Brierley: “So, therefore it’s just as random as any product of evolution.”

Dawkins: “Well, you could say that…uh, but it doesn’t in any case…nothing about it makes it more probable that there is anything supernatural.”

Brierley: “OK, but ultimately, your belief that rape is wrong is as arbitrary as the fact that we’ve evolved five fingers rather than six.”

Dawkins: “You could say that, yes.”

(Emphasis from source.)